SCRA Rights Not An Absolute Shield- Increase in Child Support Order Sustained

scra rightsAll too often, servicemembers assume that their protections under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) are tantamount to absolute immunity from suit because of the rights enjoyed by the servicemember pursuant to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”).  That is not the case.  In a recent Alaska Supreme Court case, it upheld a lower court’s ruling to increase the amount of child support a servicemember must pay, after considering the servicemember’s SCRA protections.

The servicemember had complained that the lower court had committed an error by issuing the order and that the order was violative of the SCRA.

It is important to note that the servicemember was not alleging that his participation in the court action was impossible because of his duties, nor was a stay requested.  In fact, he had participated in the lower court proceedings by filing pleadings.  The servicemember had contended that he was not allowed by the court to be present at the hearing or to speak and that this violated his SCRA rights.  The Alaska Supreme Court held that the lower court followed an acceptable practice of decisions upon the pleadings and documentation and that no one had raised the issue of whether the income reports, upon which the court relied, were accurate.  The estoppel effect of not raising such issues was also taken into account.

This case serves as another reminder that the SCRA is not an impenetrable shield against all judgments.  In fact, the thrust of the SCRA is on default judgments, usually entered by a Clerk of the Court when a summons or complaint is not answered within the statutory requirements.  In those situations, the Clerk may not enter a default judgment unless there is an indication whether the person is on active military duty.  If the person is on active duty, or if there is any doubt, then the matter must be referred to a judge who reviews whether adequate efforts were undertaken to conduct a military verification, whether an attorney must be appointed (for which there is no federal funding at this time), and whether a bond may be required from the Plaintiff.   Review the SCRA for the applicable provisions.

Attorney Roy Kaufmann serves as the Director of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act Centralized Verification Service, located in Washington, D.C. As a recognized authority on the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, Mr. Kaufmann has published hundreds of articles and hosted many webinars. His teachings help law firms and businesses to remain compliant with the SCRA rules and regulations so as to avoid costly fines.

Copyright © 2018 by SCRA, LLC. All rights reserved.
Customer Reviews Accepted Modes of Payment